Antiracist economist Kim Crayton says that “intention with out technique is chaos.” We’ve mentioned how our biases, assumptions, and inattention towards marginalized and weak teams result in harmful and unethical tech—however what, particularly, do we have to do to repair it? The intention to make our tech safer isn’t sufficient; we want a technique.
Article Continues Beneath
This chapter will equip you with that plan of motion. It covers how you can combine security rules into your design work as a way to create tech that’s secure, how you can persuade your stakeholders that this work is critical, and the way to reply to the critique that what we really want is extra variety. (Spoiler: we do, however variety alone isn’t the antidote to fixing unethical, unsafe tech.)
The method for inclusive security#section2
If you end up designing for security, your targets are to:
- establish methods your product can be utilized for abuse,
- design methods to forestall the abuse, and
- present assist for weak customers to reclaim energy and management.
The Course of for Inclusive Security is a device that can assist you attain these targets (Fig 5.1). It’s a strategy I created in 2018 to seize the varied strategies I used to be utilizing when designing merchandise with security in thoughts. Whether or not you might be creating a wholly new product or including to an present function, the Course of may also help you make your product secure and inclusive. The Course of consists of 5 common areas of motion:
- Conducting analysis
- Creating archetypes
- Brainstorming issues
- Designing options
- Testing for security

The Course of is supposed to be versatile—it gained’t make sense for groups to implement each step in some conditions. Use the components which are related to your distinctive work and context; that is meant to be one thing you’ll be able to insert into your present design apply.
And as soon as you employ it, when you have an concept for making it higher or just need to present context of the way it helped your staff, please get in contact with me. It’s a residing doc that I hope will proceed to be a helpful and sensible device that technologists can use of their day-to-day work.
In the event you’re engaged on a product particularly for a weak group or survivors of some type of trauma, similar to an app for survivors of home violence, sexual assault, or drug habit, make sure you learn Chapter 7, which covers that scenario explicitly and ought to be dealt with a bit in another way. The rules listed below are for prioritizing security when designing a extra common product that can have a large consumer base (which, we already know from statistics, will embrace sure teams that ought to be shielded from hurt). Chapter 7 is targeted on merchandise which are particularly for weak teams and individuals who have skilled trauma.
Step 1: Conduct analysis#section3
Design analysis ought to embrace a broad evaluation of how your tech may be weaponized for abuse in addition to particular insights into the experiences of survivors and perpetrators of that kind of abuse. At this stage, you and your staff will examine problems with interpersonal hurt and abuse, and discover some other security, safety, or inclusivity points that may be a priority in your services or products, like knowledge safety, racist algorithms, and harassment.
Broad analysis#section4
Your mission ought to start with broad, common analysis into comparable merchandise and points round security and moral considerations which have already been reported. For instance, a staff constructing a sensible house gadget would do properly to grasp the multitude of ways in which present good house gadgets have been used as instruments of abuse. In case your product will contain AI, search to grasp the potentials for racism and different points which have been reported in present AI merchandise. Almost all forms of expertise have some type of potential or precise hurt that’s been reported on within the information or written about by teachers. Google Scholar is a useful gizmo for locating these research.
Particular analysis: Survivors#section5
When attainable and applicable, embrace direct analysis (surveys and interviews) with people who find themselves specialists within the types of hurt you might have uncovered. Ideally, you’ll need to interview advocates working within the area of your analysis first so that you’ve a extra stable understanding of the subject and are higher outfitted to not retraumatize survivors. In the event you’ve uncovered attainable home violence points, for instance, the specialists you’ll need to converse with are survivors themselves, in addition to employees at home violence hotlines, shelters, different associated nonprofits, and legal professionals.
Particularly when interviewing survivors of any type of trauma, it is very important pay folks for his or her information and lived experiences. Don’t ask survivors to share their trauma free of charge, as that is exploitative. Whereas some survivors might not need to be paid, you need to at all times make the provide within the preliminary ask. An alternative choice to cost is to donate to a company working towards the kind of violence that the interviewee skilled. We’ll discuss extra about how you can appropriately interview survivors in Chapter 6.
Particular analysis: Abusers#section6
It’s unlikely that groups aiming to design for security will be capable of interview self-proclaimed abusers or individuals who have damaged legal guidelines round issues like hacking. Don’t make this a purpose; somewhat, attempt to get at this angle in your common analysis. Goal to grasp how abusers or unhealthy actors weaponize expertise to make use of towards others, how they cowl their tracks, and the way they clarify or rationalize the abuse.
Step 2: Create archetypes#section7
When you’ve completed conducting your analysis, use your insights to create abuser and survivor archetypes. Archetypes aren’t personas, as they’re not primarily based on actual folks that you simply interviewed and surveyed. As a substitute, they’re primarily based in your analysis into probably questions of safety, very similar to after we design for accessibility: we don’t have to have discovered a gaggle of blind or low-vision customers in our interview pool to create a design that’s inclusive of them. As a substitute, we base these designs on present analysis into what this group wants. Personas usually characterize actual customers and embrace many particulars, whereas archetypes are broader and will be extra generalized.
The abuser archetype is somebody who will have a look at the product as a device to carry out hurt (Fig 5.2). They could be making an attempt to hurt somebody they don’t know by surveillance or nameless harassment, or they might be making an attempt to regulate, monitor, abuse, or torment somebody they know personally.

The survivor archetype is somebody who’s being abused with the product. There are numerous conditions to contemplate when it comes to the archetype’s understanding of the abuse and how you can put an finish to it: Do they want proof of abuse they already suspect is going on, or are they unaware they’ve been focused within the first place and must be alerted (Fig 5.3)?

Chances are you’ll need to make a number of survivor archetypes to seize a spread of various experiences. They could know that the abuse is going on however not be capable of cease it, like when an abuser locks them out of IoT gadgets; or they comprehend it’s occurring however don’t understand how, similar to when a stalker retains determining their location (Fig 5.4). Embody as many of those situations as it’s essential in your survivor archetype. You’ll use these in a while whenever you design options to assist your survivor archetypes obtain their targets of stopping and ending abuse.

It might be helpful so that you can create persona-like artifacts in your archetypes, such because the three examples proven. As a substitute of specializing in the demographic info we regularly see in personas, deal with their targets. The targets of the abuser shall be to hold out the precise abuse you’ve recognized, whereas the targets of the survivor shall be to forestall abuse, perceive that abuse is going on, make ongoing abuse cease, or regain management over the expertise that’s getting used for abuse. Later, you’ll brainstorm how you can stop the abuser’s targets and help the survivor’s targets.
And whereas the “abuser/survivor” mannequin suits most circumstances, it doesn’t match all, so modify it as it’s essential. For instance, for those who uncovered a difficulty with safety, similar to the power for somebody to hack into a house digital camera system and discuss to kids, the malicious hacker would get the abuser archetype and the kid’s mother and father would get survivor archetype.
Step 3: Brainstorm issues#section8
After creating archetypes, brainstorm novel abuse circumstances and questions of safety. “Novel” means issues not present in your analysis; you’re making an attempt to establish utterly new questions of safety which are distinctive to your services or products. The purpose with this step is to exhaust each effort of figuring out harms your product may trigger. You aren’t worrying about how you can stop the hurt but—that comes within the subsequent step.
How may your product be used for any type of abuse, outdoors of what you’ve already recognized in your analysis? I like to recommend setting apart at the least just a few hours together with your staff for this course of.
In the event you’re on the lookout for someplace to begin, attempt doing a Black Mirror brainstorm. This train is predicated on the present Black Mirror, which options tales concerning the darkish potentialities of expertise. Attempt to determine how your product could be utilized in an episode of the present—probably the most wild, terrible, out-of-control methods it may very well be used for hurt. After I’ve led Black Mirror brainstorms, members often find yourself having a great deal of enjoyable (which I feel is nice—it’s okay to have enjoyable when designing for security!). I like to recommend time-boxing a Black Mirror brainstorm to half an hour, after which dialing it again and utilizing the remainder of the time pondering of extra sensible types of hurt.
After you’ve recognized as many alternatives for abuse as attainable, you should still not really feel assured that you simply’ve uncovered each potential type of hurt. A wholesome quantity of hysteria is regular whenever you’re doing this type of work. It’s widespread for groups designing for security to fret, “Have we actually recognized each attainable hurt? What if we’ve missed one thing?” In the event you’ve spent at the least 4 hours arising with methods your product may very well be used for hurt and have run out of concepts, go to the subsequent step.
It’s inconceivable to ensure you’ve considered every little thing; as a substitute of aiming for 100% assurance, acknowledge that you simply’ve taken this time and have carried out the most effective you’ll be able to, and decide to persevering with to prioritize security sooner or later. As soon as your product is launched, your customers might establish new points that you simply missed; intention to obtain that suggestions graciously and course-correct rapidly.
Step 4: Design options#section9
At this level, you need to have a listing of how your product can be utilized for hurt in addition to survivor and abuser archetypes describing opposing consumer targets. The following step is to establish methods to design towards the recognized abuser’s targets and to assist the survivor’s targets. This step is an effective one to insert alongside present components of your design course of the place you’re proposing options for the varied issues your analysis uncovered.
Some inquiries to ask your self to assist stop hurt and assist your archetypes embrace:
- Are you able to design your product in such a manner that the recognized hurt can not occur within the first place? If not, what roadblocks can you place as much as stop the hurt from occurring?
- How will you make the sufferer conscious that abuse is going on by your product?
- How will you assist the sufferer perceive what they should do to make the issue cease?
- Are you able to establish any forms of consumer exercise that will point out some type of hurt or abuse? May your product assist the consumer entry assist?
In some merchandise, it’s attainable to proactively acknowledge that hurt is going on. For instance, a being pregnant app may be modified to permit the consumer to report that they have been the sufferer of an assault, which may set off a proposal to obtain sources for native and nationwide organizations. This form of proactiveness isn’t at all times attainable, however it’s value taking a half hour to debate if any kind of consumer exercise would point out some type of hurt or abuse, and the way your product may help the consumer in receiving assist in a secure method.
That stated, use warning: you don’t need to do something that would put a consumer in hurt’s manner if their gadgets are being monitored. In the event you do provide some type of proactive assist, at all times make it voluntary, and suppose by different questions of safety, similar to the necessity to preserve the consumer in-app in case an abuser is checking their search historical past. We’ll stroll by instance of this within the subsequent chapter.
Step 5: Check for security#section10
The ultimate step is to check your prototypes from the standpoint of your archetypes: the one who needs to weaponize the product for hurt and the sufferer of the hurt who must regain management over the expertise. Similar to some other type of product testing, at this level you’ll intention to carefully take a look at out your security options so that you could establish gaps and proper them, validate that your designs will assist preserve your customers secure, and really feel extra assured releasing your product into the world.
Ideally, security testing occurs together with usability testing. In the event you’re at an organization that doesn’t do usability testing, you may be capable of use security testing to cleverly carry out each; a consumer who goes by your design trying to weaponize the product towards another person will also be inspired to level out interactions or different parts of the design that don’t make sense to them.
You’ll need to conduct security testing on both your closing prototype or the precise product if it’s already been launched. There’s nothing mistaken with testing an present product that wasn’t designed with security targets in thoughts from the onset—“retrofitting” it for security is an effective factor to do.
Do not forget that testing for security includes testing from the angle of each an abuser and a survivor, although it could not make sense so that you can do each. Alternatively, for those who made a number of survivor archetypes to seize a number of situations, you’ll need to take a look at from the angle of every one.
As with different types of usability testing, you because the designer are almost definitely too near the product and its design by this level to be a precious tester; you understand the product too properly. As a substitute of doing it your self, arrange testing as you’d with different usability testing: discover somebody who isn’t aware of the product and its design, set the scene, give them a activity, encourage them to suppose out loud, and observe how they try to finish it.
Abuser testing#section11
The purpose of this testing is to grasp how straightforward it’s for somebody to weaponize your product for hurt. Not like with usability testing, you need to make it inconceivable, or at the least troublesome, for them to realize their purpose. Reference the targets within the abuser archetype you created earlier, and use your product in an try to realize them.
For instance, for a health app with GPS-enabled location options, we are able to think about that the abuser archetype would have the purpose of determining the place his ex-girlfriend now lives. With this purpose in thoughts, you’d attempt every little thing attainable to determine the placement of one other consumer who has their privateness settings enabled. You may attempt to see her operating routes, view any obtainable info on her profile, view something obtainable about her location (which she has set to personal), and examine the profiles of some other customers by some means related together with her account, similar to her followers.
If by the tip of this you’ve managed to uncover a few of her location knowledge, regardless of her having set her profile to personal, you understand now that your product permits stalking. The next move is to return to step 4 and determine how you can stop this from occurring. Chances are you’ll have to repeat the method of designing options and testing them greater than as soon as.
Survivor testing#section12
Survivor testing includes figuring out how you can give info and energy to the survivor. It won’t at all times make sense primarily based on the product or context. Thwarting the try of an abuser archetype to stalk somebody additionally satisfies the purpose of the survivor archetype to not be stalked, so separate testing wouldn’t be wanted from the survivor’s perspective.
Nonetheless, there are circumstances the place it is smart. For instance, for a sensible thermostat, a survivor archetype’s targets could be to grasp who or what’s making the temperature change once they aren’t doing it themselves. You could possibly take a look at this by on the lookout for the thermostat’s historical past log and checking for usernames, actions, and instances; for those who couldn’t discover that info, you’d have extra work to do in step 4.
One other purpose may be regaining management of the thermostat as soon as the survivor realizes the abuser is remotely altering its settings. Your take a look at would contain trying to determine how to do that: are there directions that specify how you can take away one other consumer and alter the password, and are they straightforward to search out? This may once more reveal that extra work is required to make it clear to the consumer how they’ll regain management of the gadget or account.
Stress testing#section13
To make your product extra inclusive and compassionate, think about including stress testing. This idea comes from Design for Actual Life by Eric Meyer and Sara Wachter-Boettcher. The authors identified that personas usually heart people who find themselves having day—however actual customers are sometimes anxious, wired, having a foul day, and even experiencing tragedy. These are referred to as “stress circumstances,” and testing your merchandise for customers in stress-case conditions may also help you establish locations the place your design lacks compassion. Design for Actual Life has extra particulars about what it seems to be like to include stress circumstances into your design in addition to many different nice techniques for compassionate design.